1978-VIL-36-SC-DT

Equivalent Citation: [1979] 117 ITR 569 (SC)

Supreme Court of India

Civil Appeal Nos. 2396 and 2397 of 1978

Date: 04.12.1978

UPPER INDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE P. LTD.

Vs

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

BENCH

P. N. BHAGWATI., V. D. TULZAPURKAR. and R. S. PATHAK.

JUDGMENT

There are two questions in respect of which a reference has been directed by the High Court on the application of the revenue under s. 256(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961. So far as the first question is concerned, it is undoubtedly a question of law and could properly form the subject-matter of a reference but the second question as framed is clearly a question of fact and we fail to see how it could be directed to be referred by the High Court. The question whether a particular expenditure on rent is excessive and unreasonable or not is essentially a question of fact and does not involve any issue of law and hence we are of the view that the second question ought not to have been directed to be referred by the High Court. But if the second question could not form the subject-matter of a reference, then obviously the first question becomes academic, because s. 40A(2)(a) cannot have any application, unless it is first held that the expenditure on rent was excessive or unreasonable. We, accordingly, allow the appeal and set aside the order of reference made by the High Court. There will be no order as to costs of the appeal.

Appeal allowed.

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.